Tag Archives: adage

5 Marketing Trends & TASC

It was a big press week today with back to back articles in AdAge and AdWeek, two periodicals I highly respect in the advertising industry.

Meet the Five Big Trends Changing Marketing:  This was an article I wrote for AdAge which is based off of The Media Kitchen‘s Menu (2011, 2012 version), a document we release each year that talks about five trends and associated companies that are poised to grow with this trend.

Below are the five trends I highlight and if you want to read the whole article, click here.

  1. Communication across many social platforms will be seamless
  2. Location will play an increasingly important role for targeting
  3. Cross platform plans will be driven by data
  4. Content is marketing and marketing is certainly content
  5. Experiences will be linked across many devices

Technology, Advertising and Startup Council (#TASCNYC):  On Monday, David Berkowitz, Ian Schafer, Mark Silva and I will be hosting the inaugural event for TASC at the Soho House here in New York City.  The goal of the event is for create more of a bond between Madison Avenue and Silicon Valley/Alley through spending time with different startups to help them accelerate themselves.  It’s not a pitch for media budget but rather a business building exercise where we can help these companies position themselves better to work with Madison Avenue.  I’m super excited to be working alongside David, Mark and Ian and look forward to what future events might bring.  You can read much more about #tascnyc here.


2012 Advertising & Media Technology Predictions

Over the years, instead of writing my own forecasts and predictions, I’ve aggregated them on this blog as a source for everyone to turn to for marketing, technology and media.  Here are the lists for 2008, 2009, and 2010.  This year, instead of aggregating them, I wrote 5 predictions that I think will come true for Advertising and Marketing Technology in 2012.

The predictions are below, but you can read more about them here on Advertising Age.

1.  The vGRP metric gets adopted once released and AdXpose/Comscore finally makes sense to most people

2.  Trading Desks are no longer the bright shiny object for Madison Avenue as they begin to mature and become growth businesses for holding companies.  Holding companies need to make a strategic decision whether or not they are going to continue to support them and if so, they must acknowledge and realize they are building technology organizations.  If not, we’ll start to see some trading desks spinning down (or out) of holding companies in 2012.

3.  Agencies who are not agencies will challenge the agencies.  I like the title on this one:  tomorrow’s madison avenue will look different than todays.  Read more about it in-depth over at Ad Age.

4.  Attribution drives dollars to currently undervalued assets.  By using engagement mapping, TrueCPA, or other fun names for understanding conversion attribution, media buyers will actually be able to purchase sites that aren’t part of the lower purchase funnel.

5.  And of course, what marketing technology trend and prediction list would not include Consolidation and Investment as a headline?  Mine certainly will.

I’m super excited about the above 5.  There are quite a few more but these are my starting five going into 2012.

Agency Demand Platforms

My friend Jay Sears (@jaysears) sent me an invite to the AdClub/ContextWeb event on Agency Demand Platforms a few weeks ago and was impressed to see the high caliber speakers but was bummed out that MDC/VMM was not asked to participate as well, as, my friends at Havas.

The event was packed – almost every seat taken in the beautiful NY Times Center and quickly got underway by a speech by Carl Fremont about the Digital Action program of the AdClub.  Digital Action is actually really cool – publishers donate inventory and the AdClub gets to sell it and keep the money to provide scholarships for their students.  We’re working on a deal which should hopefully provide some dollars to the AdClub so I was excited to see Carl speak about it.

Bant Breen (Initiative), Sloan Broderick (Mediacom Interaction), Greg Green (VivaKi), Matt Spiegel (Omnicom), Ross Sandler (RBC), and Wenda Harris Millard (MediaLink) all participated on the panel and had a healthy discussion that to industry outsiders may have been fascinating, but to industry insiders, was much of the same fodder we hear each day.  For those interested in reading the play by play of the event, AdExchanger has a fantastic writeup and I recommend checking it out.

I want to use this blog post to talk about a few of the issues/hurdles that affect Agency Demand Platforms and their roll-out to advertising agency holding companies such as IPG, WPP, Omnicom, Publicis, Havas, and MDC Partners.  Many of these thoughts come out at lunches or dinners I have with my peers at other demand platforms but I thought that publishing them online may spark a larger conversation with all industry constituents:  investors, agency execs, media folks, technologists, startups, PR, etc.

What is a Demand Platform?   This term is thrown around with increasing frequency but I’ve not seen a solid definition around it.  AdAge wrote a piece on all of our agency platforms that we are building and this comes closest to what I define as a Demand Platform:  a technology solution with a front-end interface where agencies (media, creative) have access to procurement, optimization, warehousing, and analytics.  All of us are building something within this vein but each of us has our own cupcake with different sprinkles.

I do not think that Demand Platforms have to be limited to single supply sources such as advertising exchanges.  It seemed as if the majority of the AdClub/ContextWeb event was based around exchanges, but supply sources can be various.  Currently, we are seeing typical ad networks, publisher exchanges (i.e. FimServe), reservation systems such as Apt, broad exchanges (e.g. RMX, AdX) and sites direct are able to plug into Demand Platforms.  Personally, I look forward to the day when inventory goes beyond OLA into search, mobile, print, radio, television, and OOH.


Agencies vs. Technology Companies: Agencies have always adopted technologies tactically, but if they are to roll-out a Demand Platform, to be successful, it must be strategic.  Most agencies are not staffed up with technologists (broad term for many different types of technology people) and most management in agencies are not trained in running technology companies.   Technology companies also invest in R&D and top talent, as what they build has scaling capabilities and they can recoup these dollars.  Agencies are a staffed differently and generally never hire beyond revenue.  Depending on the agency, holding company, and timing of the financial markets, agencies wanting to become a technology company may be a far dream (if building their own tech).

I predict most agency holding companies are going to work with strategic partners to roll-out their Demand Platforms as for the aforementioned reasons.  There are a few partners in the market today that are getting some nice publicity and traction such as MediaMath, Invite Media, Triggit, AdChemy, X+1, DataXu, Brilig, and others.  The question is whether to go exclusive or remain independent and this is a major question for many of us.   The partners above service the ad-serving & algorithmic optimization space but there is also data warehousing, data aggregation, and creative optimization that plays within here too and there is a whole host of other partners to deal with there.

Changing Media Culture:  Media planners and buyers have applied the human element to optimization for the past 15 years or so and are used to buying sites as a proxy for audience.  Most of our Demand Platforms focus on buying “audiences,” which is fundamentally different than purchasing sites in themselves, so re-educating the entire media planning and buying world about this new paradigm will have to occur.  Technology is going to strategically penetrate agencies if this happens and the education process is going to take a while and not only are we going to have to educate internally to our agency staff, but also, to our clients.  As always, there are going to be conservative clients/agencies and progressive which means that most people will fall in the middle.  I can’t stress enough how much of a barrier this is for the industry.  Changing culture is not easy and the visionaries will have to be in place in the agencies and clients must remain open minded, as the way they have purchased digital media in the past will change.

I am not stressing that media planners and buyers are going to be out of a job, as one can read the above paragraph and deduce that.  I hypothesize that we are going to have a something like a performance display group and an integrated team.  All IAB/OPA standard units will run through the performance group through a Demand Platform while the media/creative staff’s time will be freed up to create big brand experiences.   For publishers, read my “Goodbye Media Sales Execs” post.

Business Terms/Pricing:  I’m going to attack this dead-on as all too often, this question gets avoided.  In the USA, agencies typically do not take posession of media (unlike Europe) and sell back to their clients, but rather make a scaling commission on all of the media that is purchased on behalf of clients.   With Demand Platforms and the ability to purchase on Advertising Exchanges, there are similar models to SEM (search engine marketing) emerging:

  • Cost Plus – this model takes into account of the cost of the media plus a standard consistent markup for the “secret sauce” (optimization, data, research, analytics, etc)
  • Blended/Arb – this model is where the agency takes posession of the media and prices it back to the client at their discretion
  • Pass Through – media agencies will just take their typical media buying or success comission/compensation for OLA planning

Most of the players including VivaKi, Cadreon, B3, Adnetik, VMM do not publicly disclose their business models and that’s valid and fair.  I’d assume however that most models are based on one or multiples of the three scenarios above.  If there is another scenario that I’ve missed, I’d love to know about it.

Note:  as explained above, agencies in the USA cannot take positions on media and sell back to clients.  This is why seperate companies have been set up to provide church/state seperation.

Real vs. Near-Real vs. Non-Real-Time:  I don’t know how this is a hurdle, but I want to point out that saying “real-time” is the “cool” thing to say right now but there is almost no substance behind it to the trained eye.  There are less than a half dozen exchanges who can support real-time, and of those real-time exchanges, they are dwarfed in scale from the big guys.  There is no doubt that real-time is going to be interesting in the future, but as of July 14, 2009, this is purely an ego play.

The Agency Demand Platform Ecosystem

While working on the Agency Demand Platform project, an entire ecosystem is impacted and innovated upon.  The following business areas are affected by these new Platforms (depending on the particular platform of course):

  • Dynamic creative
  • Analytics (insight)
  • Data warehousing
  • Decisioning and processing
  • Visualization
  • Algorithmic development
  • Yield management
  • Ad operations (trafficking, pixel implementation)
  • Data privacy
  • Media planning & buying (communications planning)

Want to share your viewpoint?   Did I miss something?  Feel free to leave a comment or tweet me at @dherman76