<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Focus Group on Digital but Interesting Nonetheless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/11/01/small-focus-group-on-digital-but-interesting-nonetheless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/11/01/small-focus-group-on-digital-but-interesting-nonetheless/</link>
	<description>Marketing, Media, and Technology Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Feb 2012 19:55:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: senithomas</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/11/01/small-focus-group-on-digital-but-interesting-nonetheless/comment-page-1/#comment-95023</link>
		<dc:creator>senithomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=1040#comment-95023</guid>
		<description>One point to consider though is that dorms weren&#039;t tracked by Nielsen until recently and the sample is still very small.  Therefore they aren&#039;t really represented in terms of the viewing audience so no one is really &quot;paying&quot; for them anyway.  Thus, the networks are better off having them view on Hulu/Their site where they make some $ off of them vs. an audience that isnt really counted and therefore cant be monetized through TV. IPTV changes the scenario of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One point to consider though is that dorms weren&#39;t tracked by Nielsen until recently and the sample is still very small.  Therefore they aren&#39;t really represented in terms of the viewing audience so no one is really &#8220;paying&#8221; for them anyway.  Thus, the networks are better off having them view on Hulu/Their site where they make some $ off of them vs. an audience that isnt really counted and therefore cant be monetized through TV. IPTV changes the scenario of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fendien</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/11/01/small-focus-group-on-digital-but-interesting-nonetheless/comment-page-1/#comment-95021</link>
		<dc:creator>fendien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=1040#comment-95021</guid>
		<description>although in many dorms you may not find cable, once students move off campus you&#039;d be hard pressed to find people without cable. just something to consider, that its more of a &quot;new to college and living in the dorms with whatever they give me&quot; sort of thing, versus having the opportunity to get cable and instead using hulu/boxee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>although in many dorms you may not find cable, once students move off campus you&#39;d be hard pressed to find people without cable. just something to consider, that its more of a &#8220;new to college and living in the dorms with whatever they give me&#8221; sort of thing, versus having the opportunity to get cable and instead using hulu/boxee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the2noelle</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/11/01/small-focus-group-on-digital-but-interesting-nonetheless/comment-page-1/#comment-95005</link>
		<dc:creator>the2noelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=1040#comment-95005</guid>
		<description>We discussed the same thing at the Trend School I went to last week with a panel of 8 18-23 year olds. Interestingly many of them talked of Hulu on the level of appointment viewing for shows that they had missed or that they normally didn&#039;t watch but friends would talk about... Most still found TV valuable to &quot;zone out&quot; in front of and/or for tv viewing that required &#039;real time&quot; like sports. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What popped in my head was not that the cable box was obsolete but with Hulu and other web based content, that there is really no longer a reason for products like TiVo or DVRs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discussed the same thing at the Trend School I went to last week with a panel of 8 18-23 year olds. Interestingly many of them talked of Hulu on the level of appointment viewing for shows that they had missed or that they normally didn&#39;t watch but friends would talk about&#8230; Most still found TV valuable to &#8220;zone out&#8221; in front of and/or for tv viewing that required &#39;real time&#8221; like sports. </p>
<p>What popped in my head was not that the cable box was obsolete but with Hulu and other web based content, that there is really no longer a reason for products like TiVo or DVRs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

