<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Featured in the NY Times Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/</link>
	<description>Marketing, Media, and Technology Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Feb 2012 19:55:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan Zlotnick</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Zlotnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92715</guid>
		<description>I get some seriously crunched eyebrow stares from creative associates, but I like the dive into the thick of it -- the analytic rigor that the better the metrics the better the creative (and the better For creatives).  It can be the key, not the lock, to greater creative involvement in ROI conversations. Seems to me there&#039;s a 24/7 role that ROI -- and &quot;Media Optimization&quot;-- at play in our every decision -- not just in what to buy, but what to &quot;buy into&quot; -- who to love, when to commit, when to revolt, where and how to leap and risk....Bring it on Darren; the more enlightened the conversation -- especially in the 3rd dimension of audience -- the more likely creative lightening will strike in the right place at the right time, sparking, not killing, the ideas that move people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get some seriously crunched eyebrow stares from creative associates, but I like the dive into the thick of it &#8212; the analytic rigor that the better the metrics the better the creative (and the better For creatives).  It can be the key, not the lock, to greater creative involvement in ROI conversations. Seems to me there&#39;s a 24/7 role that ROI &#8212; and &#8220;Media Optimization&#8221;&#8211; at play in our every decision &#8212; not just in what to buy, but what to &#8220;buy into&#8221; &#8212; who to love, when to commit, when to revolt, where and how to leap and risk&#8230;.Bring it on Darren; the more enlightened the conversation &#8212; especially in the 3rd dimension of audience &#8212; the more likely creative lightening will strike in the right place at the right time, sparking, not killing, the ideas that move people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Tsai</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92436</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Tsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92436</guid>
		<description>The Wall Street analogy is certainly evocative, and begs the question whether online media will some day be bought and sold in the same manner that stocks, options, commodities, currencies and futures today are traded today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, some fundamental differences exist between online ad impressions and financial assets, and this suggests that the online ad markets could and should evolve differently.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ad impressions aren’t similar to commodities like oil. There’s no way to park and store ad impressions the way you can warehouse barrels of oil, something that oil traders have been doing by buying tankers to warehouse oil bought at the cheaper spot market rate and sold forward at higher rates for future delivery (the contango trade).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congratulations Darren and John on the great coverage - and I look forward to seeing how you guys will continue to evolve this market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street analogy is certainly evocative, and begs the question whether online media will some day be bought and sold in the same manner that stocks, options, commodities, currencies and futures today are traded today.</p>
<p>Of course, some fundamental differences exist between online ad impressions and financial assets, and this suggests that the online ad markets could and should evolve differently.</p>
<p>Ad impressions aren’t similar to commodities like oil. There’s no way to park and store ad impressions the way you can warehouse barrels of oil, something that oil traders have been doing by buying tankers to warehouse oil bought at the cheaper spot market rate and sold forward at higher rates for future delivery (the contango trade).</p>
<p>Congratulations Darren and John on the great coverage &#8211; and I look forward to seeing how you guys will continue to evolve this market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon burg</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92351</link>
		<dc:creator>jon burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92351</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s so cool! Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s so cool! Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92180</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92180</guid>
		<description>Darren, great to see you and all of your talents in the middle of these important trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, great to see you and all of your talents in the middle of these important trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dherman76</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92096</link>
		<dc:creator>dherman76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92096</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jeff - know Dataxu well and have been speaking with them for the past 6 months&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;looking forward to catching up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeff &#8211; know Dataxu well and have been speaking with them for the past 6 months</p>
<p>looking forward to catching up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bussgang</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92084</link>
		<dc:creator>bussgang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92084</guid>
		<description>Darren - congrats on the piece.  Nice profile and publicity.  I have a portfolio company, DataXu, in stealth mode right now but will want to connect you with them at some point soon.  Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8211; congrats on the piece.  Nice profile and publicity.  I have a portfolio company, DataXu, in stealth mode right now but will want to connect you with them at some point soon.  Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ke</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92061</link>
		<dc:creator>ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92061</guid>
		<description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just finished reading the piece in the NYT and found it to be quite interesting.  I run a few small websites and trying to increase my traffic through online advertising has always been a dilemma for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder what advise you&#039;d give to the small entrepreneur who doesn&#039;t have a large online budget to work with.  What would be the most cost efficient way for them to let people know about their sites and it&#039;s products? This is often a story that journalists tend not to focus on, but one where I believe the majority of growth will come from i.e. from small entrepreneurs who are trying to use the efficiency and lower costs of the internet to earn a living.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I look forward to reading your views on the small points I&#039;ve raised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I just finished reading the piece in the NYT and found it to be quite interesting.  I run a few small websites and trying to increase my traffic through online advertising has always been a dilemma for me.</p>
<p>I wonder what advise you&#39;d give to the small entrepreneur who doesn&#39;t have a large online budget to work with.  What would be the most cost efficient way for them to let people know about their sites and it&#39;s products? This is often a story that journalists tend not to focus on, but one where I believe the majority of growth will come from i.e. from small entrepreneurs who are trying to use the efficiency and lower costs of the internet to earn a living.</p>
<p>I look forward to reading your views on the small points I&#39;ve raised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dherman76</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92059</link>
		<dc:creator>dherman76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92059</guid>
		<description>Michael, you raise some good points - and some of which we are already doing.  My vision is well beyond web display ads- but you need to start where the market is and when it expands, move with it.  There is no real addressable television market today other than what SimulMedia, Canoe, Time Warner, and others are doing in a very small way (today).  The market will be huge in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for traffic patterns - VMM tries to understand these best as possible and create strategies which includes time of day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great thoughts - lets chat offline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you raise some good points &#8211; and some of which we are already doing.  My vision is well beyond web display ads- but you need to start where the market is and when it expands, move with it.  There is no real addressable television market today other than what SimulMedia, Canoe, Time Warner, and others are doing in a very small way (today).  The market will be huge in the future.</p>
<p>As for traffic patterns &#8211; VMM tries to understand these best as possible and create strategies which includes time of day.</p>
<p>Great thoughts &#8211; lets chat offline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Senno</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/05/31/featured-in-the-ny-times-today/comment-page-1/#comment-92057</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Senno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=949#comment-92057</guid>
		<description>Congrats Darren. I read the piece online last night. I&#039;m really interesting with your take on media optimization and feel strongly about leveraging the data that online gives us access too. In fact, I think many of these same optimization principles should be applied to television, since so much data lives in the set-top box - yet goes unused. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know most of your work is on the buyer side, but I have some ideas about the publishers. I feel they need to create a competitive market to push marketers to be more creative, develop an incentive system that puts users in more control of the ads they see and forces advertisers to develop better creative and useful ads - way above and beyond banners. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further, I&#039;m not sure how much study you do on the drivers of traffic patterns and timing of ad placement. Most online inventory is sold on a simple rotational basis, however traffic patterns don&#039;t follow that. Publishers get traffic spikes from events or time of day or for another external reason. This lends itself somewhat to the traditional model of buying time at different prices depending on the value of the content and time - i.e. prime time television. I think it would be an interesting adventure to look into an application of this nature - either from the publisher or ad buyer perspective. I know its off topic a bit, but reading about your company got my mind going this morning. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats Darren. I read the piece online last night. I&#39;m really interesting with your take on media optimization and feel strongly about leveraging the data that online gives us access too. In fact, I think many of these same optimization principles should be applied to television, since so much data lives in the set-top box &#8211; yet goes unused. </p>
<p>I know most of your work is on the buyer side, but I have some ideas about the publishers. I feel they need to create a competitive market to push marketers to be more creative, develop an incentive system that puts users in more control of the ads they see and forces advertisers to develop better creative and useful ads &#8211; way above and beyond banners. </p>
<p>Further, I&#39;m not sure how much study you do on the drivers of traffic patterns and timing of ad placement. Most online inventory is sold on a simple rotational basis, however traffic patterns don&#39;t follow that. Publishers get traffic spikes from events or time of day or for another external reason. This lends itself somewhat to the traditional model of buying time at different prices depending on the value of the content and time &#8211; i.e. prime time television. I think it would be an interesting adventure to look into an application of this nature &#8211; either from the publisher or ad buyer perspective. I know its off topic a bit, but reading about your company got my mind going this morning. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

