<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Report:  Analysis on Deals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darrenherman.com/2008/06/07/social-media-report-analysis-on-deals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2008/06/07/social-media-report-analysis-on-deals/</link>
	<description>Marketing, Media, and Technology Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:47:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip James</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2008/06/07/social-media-report-analysis-on-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-43449</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/?p=729#comment-43449</guid>
		<description>Darren - I love the differences that the charts show between whats invested and whats sold. What makes &#039;services&#039; so large? Is that a few major deals, or really that the market is more prone to service acquisitions?

I&#039;m guessing its a few, or a single, large acquisition - with the average acquisition size over $300m its certainly skewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8211; I love the differences that the charts show between whats invested and whats sold. What makes &#8217;services&#8217; so large? Is that a few major deals, or really that the market is more prone to service acquisitions?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing its a few, or a single, large acquisition &#8211; with the average acquisition size over $300m its certainly skewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
