<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dot Com Deadpool Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/10/24/dot-com-deadpool-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/10/24/dot-com-deadpool-fund/</link>
	<description>Marketing, Media, and Technology Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Feb 2012 19:55:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/10/24/dot-com-deadpool-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-18553</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/10/24/dot-com-deadpool-fund/#comment-18553</guid>
		<description>I was thinking the exact thing. A lot of web 2.0 success stories had fathers (from a technology and feature perspective) that failed in the dot com bust. Part of their failure was that they were too far ahead for their time. The masses weren&#039;t familiar with some key components yet, or weren&#039;t comfortable with certain aspects, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the exact thing. A lot of web 2.0 success stories had fathers (from a technology and feature perspective) that failed in the dot com bust. Part of their failure was that they were too far ahead for their time. The masses weren&#8217;t familiar with some key components yet, or weren&#8217;t comfortable with certain aspects, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kareem</title>
		<link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/10/24/dot-com-deadpool-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-18536</link>
		<dc:creator>Kareem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darrenherman.com/2007/10/24/dot-com-deadpool-fund/#comment-18536</guid>
		<description>I think this is a great idea -- if you want to brainstorm further or look into what companies are available, let me know. I&#039;d be willing to bet that a lot of great ideas / companies aren&#039;t getting noticed simply because there are too many companies out there right now. In addition, there are a lot of very simple Web 2.0 sites out there that only do one thing; bundling these sites with others could produce a platform with tremendous synergies. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a great idea &#8212; if you want to brainstorm further or look into what companies are available, let me know. I&#8217;d be willing to bet that a lot of great ideas / companies aren&#8217;t getting noticed simply because there are too many companies out there right now. In addition, there are a lot of very simple Web 2.0 sites out there that only do one thing; bundling these sites with others could produce a platform with tremendous synergies. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

