Do You Trust Brands?
Brands spend billions of dollars to be top of mind when consumers make their ultimate decision: to purchase or not to purchase. Consultants, advertising agencies, media companies, and analytics organizations all come together to expose and track a consumer brand’s message out to the public.
In no more than 1 second, a consumer brand can be harmed… a brand that has millions of dollars behind it and years of existence. Recently, this has happened to two major brands. You’d expect consumers to hurt these brands, but it was the brands themselves that broke consumers trust and in effect, drew negative media attention to them and let consumers all over the globe down.
Before you can let a consumer down, you need to build up trust.  An article on BrandChannel talks about building confidence in your brands and has a good quote.
Jacques Chevron, a partner in JRC&A Consulting in LaGrange, Illinois, explains, “Brands are rooted in the trust that the consumers place in them. They are what result from consistent behavior over time: Predictability, understanding, comfort and the trust that they create. Newcomers don’t have this. Some are in the same situation as the used-car salesman who says ‘Trust me’ to generate comfort. It doesn’t work well.”
Wal-Mart and Sony have both had to reach into the medicine cabinet and rip the band aid box open and apply them rather quickly in the recent past. Wal-Mart alongside their PR agency, Edelman, tricked the world into believing a semi-false story about a couple that traveled the USA stopping at Wal-Mart locations. Sony falsified a PSP promotion and had consumers believe they were watching a site independent of Sony.
In a world where transparency is so important, why would these brand kings do this to themselves? They employ significant agencies with allegedly fantastic expertise but try and trick the world and of course, it doesn’t work.
On Wal-Mart / Edelman
It’s ironic that Edelman Worldwide helped to write the Word of Mouth Marketing Association’s code of ethics, which states: “Honesty of identity: You never obscure your identity.�
Ironic, of course, because the independent firm was publicly slapped—and publicly apologized—for being the force behind the Wal-Marting Across America blog that was unmasked as a fake created and paid for by Edelman. (Edelman Eats Humble Pie)
On Sony….
This one–the latest in a string of stealth marketing efforts–involves a “flog,” or fake blog, created by viral marketing firm Zipatoni to promote the Sony PSP. The blog, alliwantforxmasisapsp.com, was supposedly authored by an amateur hip-hop artist “Charlie”–whose cousin, “Pete,” craved a PSP under the tree.
Written in faux hip-hop and Internet lingo, the phony blog, which went live at the end of last month, quickly raised suspicions. Last week, some readers conducted a WHOIS search, which unmasked the site’s registrars as Zipatoni. (Sony Confesses to Creating ‘Flog,’ Shutters Comments)
Joseph Jaffe weighing in…
It boggles my mind how many mainstream marketers/agencies look at new marketing from the same one-dimensional, traditional, advertising based- and biased lens. When you think about it, it’s no wonder that the inevitable outcome every time is fakeness instead of authenticity.
And Greg Verdino sums it up nicely…
Half a step forward, full step back.
Comments
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
-
Anonymous
Do You Trust Brands?…
Recent SNAFU’s in the branding world around Wal-Mart and Sony. A look into them with some fantastic commentary….
-
Darren Herman - Marketing, Advertising, Media and Technology Blog » Blog Archive » Viral Marketing Misnomer
[...] How about the fake Sony blog… Remember that? I wrote about it almost 11 months ago… do consumers trust brands? [...]
hi darren,
in addition to the issue of trusting brands, do we really have relationships with brands?
all the talk of relationship marketing and consumer dialogue, do we really have a “dialogue” with brands or are we talking to ourselves as an industry. will we ever have a “relationship” with most brands? Sure, Harley, Apple and a few rare others provide the emotional support that “relationships” require to be just that.
my thought is that a brand/people relationship can only go so far (execept for the rare few). we as marketers will serve our clients better if we don’t try to force the relationship issue in our marketing, but rather focus on developing strong acquaintances. i am sure this thought will spawn some debate.
thanks!
paul marobella
brandsoapbox.typepad.com